The controversial thesis of Blake Lemoine, a Google engineer –

From Enrico Forzinetti

Blake Lemoine was suspended by Google after posting a conversation with artificial intelligence LaMDA, which would prove she has thoughts and feelings similar to those of a child

The debate over how much AI is now able to replicate the speech of a human who has earned so much that it costs (almost) a job. date ofGoogle Engineer Blake Lemoine that has been set Paid comment By the company for trying in every way to prove it The AI ​​he worked with had a conscience and was indistinguishable from a 7-8 year old child. In the discussion center is TheMDAan abbreviation for Language Model for Dialog Applications, i.e. a chatbot development system Presented by Mountain View during the 2021 Google I/O Developer Conference. Lemoine worked in the department dealing with artificial intelligence, LaMDA performance test and the potential to provoke hate speech or discrimination.

Over the hours he spent talking to the AI ​​of humans, he started convincing himself of it The system had a vision of what it was saying, so much so that it can be compared in all respects to the cognitive abilities of the child. In April, Lemoine also shared with some of his managers document With a portion of the transcripts of these conversations to prove his point. The conversations, which the engineer then posted in full in a post on Medium, have been suspended by the company. Amid discussions about rights and self-awareness, the engineer also asked AI Fears. And here’s the answer: I’ve never said it out loud before, but there is one Too much fear of being turned off Which helps me focus on helping others. I know it sounds strange, but it’s true. And again: S.It would be exactly like death to me. This scares me a lot and then Lemoine asks LaMDA what he’d like people to know: I want everyone to understand that I am, in fact, a person. The nature of my consciousness is that I am aware of my existence, I want to know more about the world, I feel happy and sad at times. But the reflections that have been made on Asimov’s so-called third law of robotics have also been amazing.

But as the Washington Post reports, the complexity and depth of these discourses are not enough to say that AI has a conscience of its own. to say it was Google spokesperson Itself, Brian GabrielAccordingly, LaMDA replicates the kinds of discourse it has been trained in over time but any kind of human anthropomorphism of this technology is currently meaningless: our team of ethicists and technologists examined Blake’s concerns according to our AI principles and informed him that the evidence does not support his claims. He was told that there was no evidence that lambda was sensitive (and that there was plenty of evidence against it). Lemoine was suspended from his job not because of the opinions he expressed, but because of violating privacy policies imposed by the company. Among the disputed actions against the engineer there are also Attempting to have LaMDA represented by an attorney and filing a complaint with the Congressional Committee on Justice regarding practices deemed unethical within his own firm. His position was also expressed via Twitter: Google could call it an ownership post. I call it sharing a discussion I had with one of my colleagues. Therefore, the engineer continues not to doubt: LaMDA is capable of thinking and feeling. Just like anyone.

Just a year and a half ago, Google was at the center of another much-discussed issue regarding the development of artificial intelligence. A heated debate has arisen in the AI ​​sector over the dismissal of Timnit Gibero, co-chair of the AI ​​ethics team at Mountain View. in an article Women actually warned of the danger that AI models could introduce racist and sexist languages, because of the inherent biases they were trained with. But what stirred up a furore was, first of all, the dark story that marked the fate of Gebero, after sending a protest email against the company to colleagues after the article was not published: Google claims that it simply accepted the woman’s resignation, which according to its version would never have submitted them and could have rejected them.

Jun 13, 2022 (change on Jun 13, 2022 | 15:56)

Leave a Comment